• About
  • contact
  • new kentucky stallions

bloodstock in the bluegrass

bloodstock in the bluegrass

Daily Archives: July 21, 2010

selecting stallions per estes

21 Wednesday Jul 2010

Posted by fmitchell07 in horse breeding, horse racing, people, thoroughbred racehorse

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

blood-horse magazine, bruce lowe, dosage, figure system, history of breeding, joe estes, selection criteria for stallions, stallion selection, statistics in thoroughbred breeding

Joe Estes was a great researcher and a monumental force in evaluating the way we think about Thoroughbred pedigrees.

When he came to the Blood-Horse about 80 years ago, nobody thought about statistics as a means of assessing bloodstock or pedigrees. For one thing, it was so hard to compile a statistically valid body of data that essentially nobody wanted to do it.

Estes was lucky to have his position at the Blood-Horse because it allowed him to search for answers with a staff that had the leisure to follow his direction and compile reams of information that he could analyse and explain to the breeding public.

The volume of information he and the magazine staff could compile allowed him to discuss things about pedigrees that were totally new to breeders. Heretofore, breeders had selected mares on the basis of the leading broodmare sires, or by the Bruce Lowe family numbers, or according to the nick.

And here comes this quiet man writing things in an upstart publication (Blood-Horse wasn’t always the house organ) that came out of left field, at least according to the way most people thought at the time. Using his command of statistics and language, Estes retarded the effect of dosage on breeding by a good half-century, and his combination of satire and research into the Figure System of Bruce Lowe effectively destroyed it as a serious breeding system.

So after writing about stallion selection this week, I went in search of some input from Estes. In the Blood-Horse of 26 August 1939, he wrote:

The most important item in appraising the stud prospects of a young horse is his racing class. The racing class and breeding records of his sire and dam are also worthy of consideration, but beyond that the pedigree will tell you nothing worth remembering.

The prevalence of the popular notion that a good sire must come from a sire family (a term invented by Bruce Lowe, all-time hocus-pocus champion in Thoroughbred breeding) is easy enough to understand. It provides  a reason to predict that a horse from a non-sire family probably will fail at the stud. And he probably will. So will the average good horse from any family.

Estes sure packed a punch, didn’t he? Still does.

Advertisement
July 2010
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jun   Aug »

Archives

Blogroll

  • Ahead by Three
  • Amateurcapper
  • antebellum turf times
  • Boojum's Bonanza
  • Consignors and Commercial Breeders Association
  • Horse Racing Business
  • horse talk uk handicapping
  • Japan Racing blog
  • New York racing (Tom Noonan)
  • Paulick Report
  • Raceday 360
  • Racing Through History
  • Reines de Course
  • Running Rough Shod
  • Sid Fernando + Observations
  • The Vault – racing history
  • Turf

writing and living

  • Fred on Everything
  • Photography and Hiking in Scotland
  • Salon

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • bloodstock in the bluegrass
    • Join 298 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • bloodstock in the bluegrass
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar